Search for: "Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad" Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2012, 10:00 am
Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Co., the Illinois Supreme Court ruled that freight trains pose an obvious risk of harm to child trespassers, but the railroad would owe no duty of care to children for injuries suffered while trying to climb onto a moving train car. [read post]
Canadian Pacific Railway owns 49% of Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company while Consolidated Rail Corporation owns 51%. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 6:14 am by Don Asher
Lawrence Seaway to the local IIPD Iroquois Landing; and (2) moving cargo and freight from Lake Michigan to its Lake Calumet Terminal and then along the Mississippi and Illinois Rivers to the Gulf of Mexico; Rail: the IIPD railway infrastructure through the Belt Railway connects to all but one of the seven North American Class I railroads (BNSF, CN, CP, CSX, NS and UP) as well as the Indiana Harbor Belt and several shortline railroads; and… [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 6:16 am by Don Asher
        03/05/2020 Fort Wayne IN – Worker died after becoming caught in conveyer belt. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 11:51 am by Kirk Jenkins
Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Co., No. 112948 -- (1) Does a defendant landowner have a duty of due care with respect to a nearly thirteen-year old injured while trying to jump aboard a slow-moving train on the landowner's tracks? [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 6:41 pm by Robin Mashal
In Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Co. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 1:30 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Co. arose from an injury to a twelve-year old boy who tried to jump aboard a slow-moving freight train. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
(Pix © Larry Catñá Backer; Bronzino Martirio di San Lorenzo, 1565-69, Florence )Judges and lawyers tend to serve as the worker bees of the large jurisprudential colonies of semiotic communities ("They do all the work in the hive, and they control most of what goes on inside. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am by Schachtman
Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Co., 461 F.3d 844 (7th Cir. 2006) (affirming summary judgment in disparate treatment discharge case, and noting judicial tendency to require “comparability” between plaintiffs and comparison group as a “natural response to cherry-picking by plaintiffs”); Miller v. [read post]